Arrow 3 Complete
- Arrow 3, an upgraded version of Israel’s Arrow 2, is a U.S.-Israeli system designed to intercept medium-range ballistic missiles.This system, developed in response to growing capabilities by regional adversaries such as Iran, operates at a higher altitude and greater range than currently fielded defense systems. 1 Arrow 3 is capable of exo-atmospheric intercepts well beyond the range of its.
- Arrow-3 missiles successfully took out target missiles in high-altitude, hit-to-kill test engagements conducted at the Pacific Spaceport Complex-Alaska in Kodiak. The tests were a joint effort between the Israel Missile Defense Organization of the Directorate of Defense Research.
“Ten challenging years of development have culminated in this moment: the Arrow 3 weapon system completed a test campaign, during which.
LaunchplatformSix canisters per trailer-mounted erector–launcherThe Arrow or Hetz (: חֵץ, pronounced ) is a family of designed to fulfill an Israeli requirement for a that would be more effective against than the. Jointly funded and produced by Israel and the United States, development of the system began in 1986 and has continued since, drawing some contested criticism. Undertaken by (IAI) and, it is overseen by the 's ' Homa ' (: חומה, pronounced, ') administration and the U.S.The Arrow system consists of the joint production Arrow anti-missile interceptor, the 'Green Pine', the 'Golden Citron' ('Citron Tree') center, and the 'Brown Hazelnut' ('Hazelnut Tree') launch control center. The system is transportable, as it can be moved to other prepared sites.Following the construction and testing of the Arrow 1 technology demonstrator, production and deployment began with the Arrow 2 version of the missile. The Arrow is considered one of the most advanced missile defense programs currently in existence. It is the first operational missile defense system specifically designed and built to intercept and destroy ballistic missiles.
The first Arrow battery was declared fully operational in October 2000. Although several of its components have been exported, the within the (IAF) of the (IDF) is currently the sole user of the complete Arrow system.The upper-tier portion of Israel's missile defense, was declared operational on January 18, 2017. Arrow 3 operates at greater speeds, greater range and at greater altitudes than Arrow 2, intercepting ballistic missiles during the space-flight portion of their trajectory. According to the chairman of the, Arrow 3 may serve as an, which would make Israel one of the world's few countries capable of shooting down satellites. See also:The Arrow program was launched in light of the acquisition by of long ranged. It was chosen over 's AB-10 missile defense system since the Arrow was judged to be a more complete concept and have greater range. The AB-10 system was criticized as being merely an improved, rather than a system designed from the outset for missile interception.The United States and Israel signed a to co-fund the Arrow program on May 6, 1986, and in 1988 the (SDIO) placed an order with Israel Aircraft Industries for the Arrow 1 technology demonstrator.
The, which exposed the controversial performance of the against ' missiles, gave further impetus to the development of the Arrow. It was initially designed to intercept missiles such as the, its 'Al Hussein' derivative, the operated by, and the operated. The Arrow evolved also with an eye on the advanced missile programs of., then, viewed the emerging missile threat as one of the most dangerous future threats on Israel's security. He said of the program that:“I had the honor, during my term of office as Minister of Defense, in the, to vote in favor of Israel's participation in the Strategic Defense Initiative. Introduced by.”The Israeli, part of the, runs the Arrow development project under the 'Homa' administration.
The 'Homa' administration, which is also commonly referred to as the IMDO – Israel Missile Defense Organization, is responsible for coordinating industrial activities of Israel's different defense companies involved in the development of the Arrow system. See also:The multibillion-dollar development program of the Arrow is undertaken in Israel with the financial support of the United States. When the development program began, the projection for the total cost of its development and manufacture – including the initial production of missiles – was an estimated $1.6 billion. The price of a single Arrow missile was estimated at $3 million. Between 1989 and 2007 some $2.4 billion had been reportedly invested in the Arrow program, 50–80 percent of which was funded by the. Israel contributes approximately $65 million annually.
Contributions to Arrow 2 program. Figures in millions of U.S. Dollars.524254.457.7656.447.4.9.26.335.622.88.2.8.4.6.1.459Criticism and opposition The Arrow program encountered opposition from the IAF, whose traditional doctrine of deterrence and use of preemptive strikes stand in sharp contrast with the nature of the missile. In addition, the IAF feared that the procurement of the costly missiles would diminish the resources allocated towards offensive projects such as fighter aircraft.A criticism of the concept of missile defense for Israel was aired by Dr. In a comprehensive study published in 1993 by the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies. The arguments made in the study conformed to the opinions of numerous defense officials and analysts, and echoed many of the arguments made by the critics in the United States.Pedatzur argued that it was exceedingly simple to fool an Arrow-type defensive system with simple, cheap, and easily installed countermeasures, which would render the Arrow system ineffective.
He doubted Israel's defense industries could rise to the challenge of such a complex system, citing anonymous experts in the IDF who predicted that the system would not be available before 2010. He envisaged enormous costs, around $10 billion, that would distort budgeting priorities and divert funds from the vital enhancement of the IDF's warfighting capability, thus forcing a profound revision of Israel's national security doctrine. He further argued that even if effective against missiles with, or, the Arrow would not be relevant against future threats of missiles with warheads, since it would never be able to supply hermetic defense and the impact of even a single nuclear warhead in Israel's would be an existential threat to Israel.At the same time, who worked then with the, stated that 'given technical problems with the systems radar and command system, coupled with its high development cost, the Arrow program may soon fall by the wayside'. Victoria Samson, a of the, also stated in October 2002 that the Arrow system cannot track an incoming missile that has split its warhead into.In June 2003 a group of Israeli chief engineers, co-inventors, and project managers of IAI and subcontractors were awarded the for the development and production of the Arrow system.According to Dr., first Director of IMDO, with the passage of time most of the pessimistic predictions have proven to be unfounded. Israel's defense industries overcame the technical challenge, the system's development was completed a full decade ahead of what was predicted, and there are no indications that the expenditures for the Arrow harmed other IDF procurement plans to any degree whatsoever. Rubin insists that Israel's missile defense is now an established fact and that most of the warnings issued by critics have failed to materialize. Pedatzur, however, remained unconvinced.
Development. A of the Arrow 1, near the. Arrow 1 The first launch of the Arrow interceptor took place on August 9, 1990, designed to test the missile's control and guidance systems.
The test came to a halt seconds after take off and the missile was intentionally destroyed due to fears it might go off track and hit a settled location. This was caused by the failure of the ground tracking radars to track the missile's. Test number two took place on March 25, 1991. Designed to check missile components during launch, it was conducted from a ship at sea. Once again a missile malfunction resulted in the abortion of the experiment. A third test, designed to examine the Arrow's interception capabilities, was conducted on October 31, 1991. The missile was once again launched from a ship at sea, and was once more aborted because of a repeat of previous malfunctions.On September 23, 1992, in another test of the missile components during launch, the systems finally operated as planned and the Arrow reached its designated point in the sky, 45 seconds after launch.
As planned, the missile was then destroyed. This successful experiment ended the system's preliminary testing phase. The fifth, sixth, and seventh tests took place on February 28, July 14, and October 14, 1993 respectively.
During these, the Arrow managed to pass in close proximity to the target missiles, thereby proving its ability to intercept surface-to-surface missiles. During test number eight on March 1, 1994, the missile was not launched due to a ground computer failure. The ninth test launch on June 12, 1994, also known as ATD#1 (Arrow Demonstration Test 1), saw an Arrow 1 successfully intercepted a target missile launched from a ship anchored in the middle of the.The Arrow 1 was reportedly a two-stage missile, with an overall length of 7.5 m (25 ft), a body diameter of 1,200 mm (47 in), and a launch weight of around 2,000 kg (4,400 lb). It was estimated that the second stage had a length of 2.5 m (8.2 ft), and that it had and guidance, with a terminal array. The missile was described as being relatively high-speed and maneuverable, with in the both stages. The range capability has been described as around 50 km (31 mi). On the other hand, the Arrow 1 could be a single stage missile.
Development of the 'big and cumbersome' Arrow 1 then ceased and further research continued with the 'smaller, faster and more lethal' Arrow 2. Arrow 2 launch in August 1996.Two successful tests (designated IIT#21 and IIT#22) of the steering, control and cruising systems were conducted without target missiles on July 30, 1995 and February 20, 1996. Two successful interceptions took place on August 20, 1996 and March 11, 1997, and were designated AIT#21 and AIT#22.Another interception test (AIT#23) was conducted on August 20, 1997, but the missile was destroyed when its steering system malfunctioned. The fault was corrected in time to ensure the success of AST#3, the first comprehensive test of the entire system. On September 14, 1998, all system components successfully countered a computer-simulated threat. On November 29, 1998, Israel Aerospace Industries delivered the first operational Arrow 2 interceptor to the Israeli Ministry of Defense.A full system interception test (AST#4) was held on November 1, 1999. During this test the Arrow system located, tracked and intercepted a TM-91C target missile simulating a 'Scud' missile, launched on a very steep trajectory from a ship located offshore.
The IAI TM-91C target missile was itself based on the Arrow 1 interceptor. On March 14, 2000, the first complete Arrow 2 battery was rolled out in a ceremony at. In his speech, then IAF commander said:“This is a great day for the Air Defense Forces, for the Air Force, the defense establishment and, I would say, for the State of Israel. As of today, we have completed the acceptance of the only weapon system of its kind in the entire world. We are the first to succeed in developing, building and operating a defense system against ballistic missiles.”Another Arrow 2 test (AST#5) took place on September 14, 2000, this time with a new target missile, the '. This airborne ballistic target missile, launched by an IAF towards Israel's coastline at a ballistic trajectory simulating an aggressor 'Scud', was intercepted and destroyed. Consequently, the following month saw the Palmachim Arrow battery declared operational by the Israeli Air Defense Command.
The 'Black Sparrow' has since been used as the aggressor target in the AST#6, AST#9, and AST#10 tests. Reportedly, in June 2001 Arrow missiles were test-fired in the course of a joint American-Israeli-Turkish exercise code-named, in the southeast of Turkey. On August 27, 2001 (AST#6), the Arrow system successfully intercepted its target at some 100 km (62 mi) from shore, the highest and farthest that the Arrow 2 had been tested to date.
In October 2002 the second battery was declared operational. Arrow 2 launch on August 26, 2004, during AST USFT#2.A successful test of the Arrow 2 block-2 took place on January 5, 2003 (AST#8).
Four missiles were launched towards four simulated targets in order to examine the interceptor's performance during special flight conditions as well as system performance during a sequence of launches. The test did not include actual interceptions. Another successful test held on December 16, 2003 (AST#9), examined the system's ability to intercept and destroy incoming missiles at significantly high altitudes, around 60 km (37 mi).
Reportedly, AST#8 and AST#9 also tested integration of the Arrow with Patriot batteries.On July 29, 2004, Israel and the United States carried out a joint test at the (NAS ) Missile Test Center in, in which the Arrow interceptor was launched against a real 'Scud-B' missile. The test represented a realistic scenario that could not have been tested in Israel due to test-field safety restrictions. To enable the test a full battery was shipped to Point Mugu. The 'Green Pine' radar and systems were deployed at the base, while the Arrow launcher was installed 100 km (62 mi) offshore on an island that forms part of the test range. The test was a success, with the interceptor destroying the 'Scud' that flew a 300 km (190 mi) trajectory at an altitude of 40 km (25 mi), west of. This was the twelfth Arrow interceptor test and the seventh test of the complete system, the first interception of a real 'Scud'.
This significant test became known as the AST USFT#1. Following this test, then, said:“We are in an age of uncertainty.
Countries in the 'third circle' Iran are continuing their efforts to acquire non-conventional capabilities along with long-ranged launch capabilities. The Arrow is the best missile system of its kind in the world, and represents a force multiplier for our future force.”AST USFT#2 was conducted at NAS Point Mugu a month later, on August 26. This test was aimed at examining the Arrow's ability to detect a splitting warhead of a separating ballistic missile. It detected the true target, but a technical malfunction reportedly prevented it from maneuvering to strike it, leading to a suspension of testing. In March–April 2005 the ability of 'Green Pine' and 'Golden Citron' to work with Patriot system elements operated by was successfully tested against simulated 'Scud'-type targets during regular series of U.S.–Israeli biennial exercises code-named '. Actual testing of the complete Arrow system was resumed in December 2005, when the system successfully intercepted a target at an unspecified but reported record low altitude.
This test (AST#10) was the fourteenth test of the Arrow missile and the ninth test of the complete system. Arrow 2 on display at in September 2008On February 11, 2007 an Arrow 2 block-3 successfully intercepted and destroyed a 'Black Sparrow' target missile simulating a ballistic missile at high altitude. It was the first so-called distributed weapon system test conducted in Israel, which required two Arrow units deployed some 100 km (62 mi) apart to share data on incoming threats and coordinate launching assignments. It was also the first time the data distribution system was used to connect two Arrow units, although the system had been used in previous tests to connect Arrow and Patriot batteries. Furthermore, an improved launcher was used. Another 'Juniper Cobra' exercises ran from March 10 to 20, 2007.
The computer simulation used for 'Juniper Cobra 2007' was similar to the computer simulation used in 'Juniper Cobra 2005'.A precursor of the next block was launched without a target on March 26, 2007 in order to gather information on its flight and performance, introducing unspecified modifications to its hardware and and reduced manufacturing costs by some 20 percent., then Director of IMDO, has said: 'Our Arrow operational system can without a doubt deal with all of the operational threats in the, particularly in Iran and Syria.' Block-4 On April 15, 2008 the Arrow weapon system successfully detected and made a simulated intercept of a new target missile, the ', a successor of the 'Black Sparrow' capable of simulating 'Scud-C/D' missiles and reportedly the as well. During the test, a target missile was launched from an IAF F-15 at a height of 90,000 feet (27.5 km). The missile split into, making it harder to intercept it. Nevertheless, 'Green Pine' tracked the warhead, simulating an intercept. In September 2008 the IDF attempted a test of actual Arrow 2 block-4 missile against the 'Blue Sparrow'.
The drill had to be aborted, however, when the target missile malfunctioned shortly after launch. Eventually the Arrow 2 block-4 was successfully tested against the 'Blue Sparrow' on April 7, 2009. Arrow 2 launch in February 2011.A July 22, 2009, joint test of the Arrow 2 block-4 against an airborne target missile with a range of over 1,000 km (620 mi) once again at the NAS Point Mugu, was reportedly aborted in the final second before launch after the missile failed to establish a communications link. A target had been released from a aircraft, the radar detected the target and transferred its tracks, but the interceptor was not launched. 'Tracking of the target worked well, but tracking trajectory information that the radar transferred to the battle management center erroneously showed we would be out of the prescribed safety range, so the mission was aborted,' a program source said.
The aborted interception came after two earlier setbacks in the planned test, initially scheduled for July 17. The first try was scuttled due to a technical glitch in the C-17 aircraft, and a planned July 20 attempt was scrubbed due to a malfunctioning that was not providing enough power to a key element of the Arrow system. The test was widely referred to as a failure, however objectives of interoperability with other ballistic missile defense systems were achieved.On February 22, 2011 the Arrow system successfully intercepted a long-range ballistic target missile during a flight test conducted at NAS Point Mugu. The target missile was launched from a mobile launch platform off the coast of California, within the Point Mugu test range. The test validated new block-4 versions designed to improve discriminating capabilities of the Arrow 2 interceptor. It was a body-to-body impact that completely destroyed the target.On February 10, 2012 developers successfully conducted the final target-tracking test prior to delivery of block-4 Arrow system. The Blue Sparrow target missile was detected and tracked by the radar, the intercept solutions were plotted by the battle management controller and transferred to the launch units.According to, block-4 upgrades 'improve the process of discrimination of what happens in the sky and the transmission of target data for much better situational control.'
Block-4 upgrades also refine midcourse guidance which, when coupled with improved target identification and discrimination capabilities, improves lethality.Block-4.1 is expected to include a new Battle Management Center, armored launchers with high shooting availability, better communication with other missile systems and wider ranges of interceptions. On September 9, 2014 an intercept test was conducted over the Mediterranean Sea with block-4.1 versions of the operational system. The outcome was inconclusive and remained so until data was fully analyzed. In February 2015, an official at the IMDO acknowledged that a test successfully acquired, but narrowly missed its target. The exact reason behind the failure was not provided, but officials initially attributed the glitch to easily correctable software issues. Block-5 By April 2011 IMDO launched initial definition of a new block-5 upgrade to the complete Arrow system that will merge the lower-tier Arrow 2 and exoatmospheric Arrow 3 into a single national missile defense system.
According to Arieh Herzog, the planned block-5 will include new ground- and airborne sensors, a system, and a new target missile – the – to simulate potentially nuclear-capable delivery vehicles developed by Iran. According to the U.S. Missile Defense Agency, block-5 is expected to be able to deal with 'more stressing regional threats' by increasing total defended area by some 50 percent.The planned block-5 will optimize the existing Super Green Pine radar to operate with the AN/TPY-2 radar as well as with radars commanding anti-ballistic missiles aboard. Radars will be used to support operations if Israel and U.S. Targets in the region come under attack. Main article:By August 2008 the United States and Israeli governments have initiated development of an upper-tier component to the Israeli Air Defense Command, known as Arrow 3. The development is based on an architecture definition study conducted in 2006–2007, determining the need for the upper-tier component to be integrated into Israel's ballistic missile defense system.
According to Arieh Herzog, the main element of this upper tier will be an exoatmospheric interceptor, to be jointly developed by IAI and Boeing. Arrow 3 was declared operational on January 18, 2017.Arrow 3 operates at greater speeds, greater range and at greater altitudes than Arrow 2, intercepting ballistic missiles during the space-flight portion of their trajectory. According to the chairman of the, Arrow 3 may serve as an, which would make Israel one of the world's few countries capable of shooting down satellites. Arrow 4 Israel’s Defense Ministry and industry developers have begun early work on what could evolve into the Arrow 4, a new missile-intercepting system to defend against much more sophisticated future threats.
Boaz Levy, IAI executive vice president, said it was probably too early to call the effort Arrow 4. Nevertheless, he acknowledged that ongoing design studies are aimed at a future interceptor that will extend capabilities beyond Arrow 2 and Arrow 3. Specifications. Arrow 2 at the Paris Air Show.The Arrow system was originally designed and optimized to intercept short and medium-range ballistic missiles with ranges above 200 km (120 mi). It is not intended to intercept either or, the second of which are relatively small and short ranged. In contrast to, and, that use kinetic, direct impact to destroy the target ('hit-to-kill') the Arrow 2 relies on explosive detonation.
Arrow 2 is able to intercept its targets above the, high enough so that any nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons do not scatter over Israel. The developers' intention was to perform the destruction sequence away from populated locations. According to Dr. Uzi Rubin, the missile was tested to determine whether chemical warfare agents would reach the ground should such a warhead be intercepted. The conclusion was that nothing would reach the ground if the warhead is destroyed above the, which flows from west to east and would therefore blow any chemical residue. Nevertheless, Arrow is also capable of low altitude interception, as well as multi-tactical ballistic missiles interception.The two-stage missile is equipped with and sustainer rocket motors.
The missile uses an initial burn to carry out a vertical hot launch from the container and a secondary burn to sustain the missile's trajectory towards the target at a speed of 9, or 2.5 km/s (1.6 mi/s). Thrust vector control is used in the boost and sustainer phases of flight. At the ignition of the second stage sustainer motor, the first stage assembly separates.
The Arrow missile is launched before the threat missile's trajectory and intercept point are accurately known. As more trajectory data becomes available, the optimum intercept point is more precisely defined, towards which the missiles is then guided.
The 500 kg (1,100 lb) section of the missile, containing the warhead, fusing and the terminal seeker, is equipped with four moving delta aerodynamic control to give low altitude interception capability. The dual mode missile seeker has a passive infrared seeker for the acquisition and tracking of tactical ballistic missiles and an active radar seeker used to home on air-breathing targets at low altitudes. The is an array. The kill vehicle is designed to achieve a hit-to-kill interception, but if this is not achieved, the will direct the warhead fragments at the target shortly before reaching the closest point to the target. The high explosive directed blast fragmentation warhead is capable of destroying a target within a 40–50 m (130–160 ft) radius. In this manner, Arrow also differs from Patriot PAC-3, THAAD, and Standard Missile 3, which rely purely on hit-to-kill technology in which the of a precise impact causes the destruction of the threat.According to, a senior developer dubbed 'the father of the Arrow anti-ballistic missile', a single Arrow interceptor has a 90 percent probability of destroying a target missile at the highest altitude possible.
In case of failure two more interceptors can be launched towards the target at short time intervals. If the first of these destroys the target, the second can be directed to another target. Using this technique, three independent interception possibilities are provided which raise the interception probability from 90 percent to 99.9 percent, thus satisfying the leakage rate requirement.
The Arrow also has the capability to simultaneously intercept a salvo of more than five incoming missiles, with the target missiles arriving within a 30-second span. Such capability is currently possessed only by the United States and Russia. According to Raviv, the Arrow can discriminate between a warhead and a.Each Arrow battery is equipped with typically four to eight erectors–launchers, its manning requires about 100 personnel. Each -mounted erector–launcher weighs 35 tonnes (77,000 lb) when loaded with six launch tubes with ready-to-fire missiles. After firing the launchers can be reloaded in an hour. The system is transportable rather than mobile, as it can be moved to other prepared sites, but cannot be set up just anywhere. Image of Arrow missile battery notional model.1.
Single Arrow launcher (6 canisters).2. 'Golden Citron'.3. Communications center.4. 'Brown Hazelnut'.5. 'Green Pine' radar antenna.6. Radar control center.7.
Radar power unit.8. Radar cooling unit.Green Pine.
Stages of missile interception by the Arrow system. The picture shows a hostile missile trajectory and that of the ' air-launched target missile used in firing tests.The 'Green Pine' is an (AESA) solid state radar operating at in the range 500 to 1,000 MHz, or 1,000 MHz to 2,000 MHz. It operates in search, detection, tracking, and missile guidance modes simultaneously. It is capable of detecting targets at ranges of up to about 500 km (310 mi) and is able to track more than 30 targets at speeds over 3,000 m/s (10,000 ft/s).
The radar illuminates the target and guides the Arrow missile to within 4 m (13 ft) of the target. Super Green PineAn advanced version of the radar, called 'Super Green Pine', 'Green Pine' Block-B, or 'Great Pine' (: אורן אדיר, pronounced ), is to take the place of the original 'Green Pine. As of 2008 both versions were active. The 'Super Green Pine' extends detection range to about 800–900 km (500–560 mi). An even more advanced upgrade of the Super Green Pine is under development. Golden Citron The 'Golden Citron' (: אתרוג זהב, pronounced ) truck-mounted Battle Management Command, Control, Communication & Intelligence Center can control up to 14 intercepts simultaneously. As of 2007 it was one of the world's most advanced net-centric systems.
The system provides fully automatic as well as options at every stage of battle operation management. It is also capable of interoperability with other theater missile defense systems and systems.
Notably, communications were being altered to allow interoperability with Patriot fire control units. Assigned targets can be handed over to the Patriot's fire control radar. Tests carried out by the U.S and Israel have successfully linked the Arrow with both U.S and Israeli versions of the Patriot.The 'Citron Tree' has three banks of operator consoles laid out in a U shape. In the center sits the in command who oversees the engagement, but also has links to the other parts of the battery as well as to IAF. On the commander's right sits the engagement officer, who ensures that targets are assigned to other engagement officers sitting on the right-hand leg of the U. Each is assigned a geographical area to defend and two of the officers are more senior as they have an overview of Patriot batteries. To the left of the commander is the resource officer, who monitors the status and readiness of the missiles.
On the left of the U sits the sky picture officer, who is in contact with the and uses the center's ability to predict impact point to alert the. Also at these consoles are an officer and an / officer, who uses recordings as it is impossible to absorb all the information during engagements. All in all, the 'Golden Citron' is manned by 7–10 operators. Brown Hazelnut The 'Brown Hazelnut' (: אגוז חום, pronounced ) launch control center is located at the launch site, up to 300 km (190 mi) from the 'Golden Citron' fire control center. It employs and data and voice communications links to the 'Green Pine' and 'Golden Citron'. The launch method is a vertical hot launch from a sealed canister, providing all- coverage. 'Brown Hazelnut' also has missile maintenance and diagnostic capabilities.
Production. Coverage of Israel provided by two Arrow 2 batteries, derived from their published locations (Palmachim, Ein Shemer) and range (90–100 km).Israel initially produced the Arrow system domestically, but on February 11, 2003 IAI and Boeing signed an agreement, valued at over $25 million for fiscal years 2003–2004, to establish production facilities for the manufacture of components for the Arrow missile in the United States. In March 2004, IAI awarded a $78 million production contract to Boeing; the total contract value could exceed $225 million through second quarter 2008. As a result of successful implementation of this contract Boeing is responsible for production of about 35 percent of Arrow missile components, including the electronics section, booster motor case and missile canister, at its facilities. IAI, the prime contractor of the Arrow system, is responsible for integration and the final assembly of the Arrow missile in Israel.
Boeing also coordinates the production of Arrow missile components manufactured by more than 150 American companies located in over 25 states. Boeing delivered its first Arrow 2 interceptor to Israel in 2005. Co-produced interceptors has been tested since February 12, 2007. Final deliveries to the Israel Air Force were planned by the end of 2010.Other major contractors are:. – produces the 'Green Pine' / 'Super Green Pine' radar;.
– produces the 'Golden Citron' Center;. – produces the sustainer motor and the warhead;. – produces the booster motor;. – produces the motor cases and the first stage;.
– produces the active radar seeker;. – produces the infrared seeker;.
– produces the.Deployment According to its original 1986 schedule, the Arrow system was supposed to enter operational service in 1995. The first operational Arrow battery was deployed, however, in March 2000 in, near the city of, south of the. It was declared operational in October 2000, and reached its full capacity in March 2001. Deployment of the second battery at , near the city of, northern Israel, was delayed by strong opposition from local residents who feared its radar would be hazardous to their health. The situation was eventually resolved and Israel's second battery completed its deployment, turned operational and linked up with first battery in October 2002.
In 2007 the IDF has reportedly decided to modify its missile defense doctrine and in order to counter possible Syrian and Iranian missile and has quietly modified its deployment of the Arrow in northern Israel.The IDF planned to procure 50 –100 interceptors for each battery. As of 1998, a battery was estimated to cost about $170 million. As of 2012, reportedly one 'Great Pine' radar is deployed alongside two 'Green Pine' radars.Israel had originally planned to deploy two Arrow 2 batteries but has since sought and won promises of funding for a third battery. Some reports stated that a third battery was already deployed, or in development in the south, while others claimed that a decision on deployment of a third battery has not yet been made, although it was under discussion for service entry in 2012. Another report stated that Israel planned to deploy not one, but two additional Arrow 2 batteries to defend the country's southern region, also covering sensitive sites such as the Negev Nuclear Research Center. However the decision about the third battery was taken in October 2010.
The new battery was expected to be put into operational use in 2012 in the center of the country. According to, some sources indicate that the new Arrow 2 battery became operational in 2012 in an Israeli Air Force facility at, roughly halfway between and, near. Export Apart from Israel no country has purchased a full Arrow system, although India had acquired and deployed three 'Green Pine' radars by August 2005.
The has sought to purchase the Arrow system since 1999, however in early 2002 the U.S. Vetoed Israel's request to sell the Arrow 2 missiles to India, exercising its right as a major funding contributor. Officials argued that the sale would violate the (MTCR). Although the Arrow 2 could possibly achieve a range of 300 km (190 mi), it is designed for intercepts at shorter ranges, and it is unclear whether it could carry a 500 kg (1,100 lb) payload to this range specified in the MTCR.
In 2011 once again an official said that the Arrow 2 might become part of India's missile defense solution.Turkey also planned to buy anti-missile air defense systems worth more than $1 billion. The Arrow was considered a potential contender, but was rejected on political grounds. In the past, the United Kingdom, Japan, and were mentioned as then potential foreign customers of the Arrow system. Netherlands reportedly expressed interest in the 'Golden Citron' center in November 1999.In the late 1990s officials of have expressed concern that any conflagration between Israel and Iraq or Iran would impact its territory. The problem becomes more difficult for Jordan when the warheads are not conventional. Therefore, during his first term of office as Prime Minister of Israel, reportedly offered Jordan 'a defensive umbrella of Arrow 2'.
Without allowing Israel to forward deploy the Arrow launchers close to the Iraqi border, the other option is for Israel to sell Jordan the Arrow system. This is most likely what Prime Minister Netanyahu meant above.
In May 1999 Israel reportedly requested U.S. Approval for selling Arrow batteries to Jordan, but apparently no such approval has been given.Armed with marketing approval by their respective governments, a U.S.–Israeli industrial team plans to offer the Arrow system to South Korea. The potential deal, estimated to exceed $1 billion.For the United States, the Arrow has provided important technical and operational data. It remains a key element in the Missile Defense Agency’s plan for a layered missile defense architecture, and an example of a successful, affordable program. At the moment, however, the United States does not have any plans to procure and deploy the Arrow. Nevertheless, in September 2009 the Arrow system was mentioned by then U.S. And then among the alternative to the proposed.
The Arrow system is being incorporated into U.S. Anti-ballistic capability in Europe, they said.In a June 2011 interview said that Arrow 2 will be integrated into a regional defense array planned by the U.S. According to the interview, it may also protect Arab countries who are allies of the U.S. But with which Israel has no diplomatic ties. By October 2015, the countries of the (GCC) had become interested in procuring the Arrow system for themselves. Operational history.
(2 March 2003), Jerusalem Letter / Viewpoints, JCPA (493), The Arrow program used practically no U.S. Technology, just U.S. It was almost entirely based on Israeli technology, though we bought some components in the U.S. Because they were cheaper. Marom, Dror (2003-03-10).
Archived from on 2011-07-21. Retrieved 2009-09-21. ^, pp. 153–54. ^. Retrieved 2010-08-01.
^ Egozi, Arie (2003-07-29). Retrieved 2009-09-12.
See also weight overprint on each canister:,. ^. Retrieved 2009-09-21. ^. Army technology. Retrieved 2009-08-19. ^ (PDF).
January 2010. Retrieved 2012-04-03. Krueger, Mathew (2008). Retrieved 2009-09-20. 'Endo and exo-atmospheric altitudes', on the sing. A presentation of the company itself. 'end&exo atmospheric interception capability' page 15.
^. Retrieved 2009-10-12. ^.
Missile Threat. Archived from on 2007-08-30. Retrieved 2009-08-19. ^. Retrieved 2009-08-21.
^. October 2008. Archived from on 2007-07-04.
Retrieved 2009-08-19. (PDF). Retrieved 2011-08-04. ^. Retrieved 2017-01-18. ^ Sharp, Jeremy M. Retrieved 2018-03-03.
^ Opall-Rome, Barbara (2009-11-09). Imaginova SpaceNews.com: 16.
Retrieved 2011-11-09. Cite journal requires journal= See also full article: (2010-03-04). ^ Lailari, Guermantes E. (April 2001). Retrieved 2009-09-22. Archived from on July 27, 2011. Retrieved 2011-02-23.
^ Pike, John E. Global Security. From the original on 5 August 2009. Retrieved 2009-08-19. Clyde, Mark R. Almanac of Policy Issues. Archived from on 2002-11-04.
Retrieved 2009-08-19. ^. Israel Missile Defense Organization. Archived from on 2009-09-08.
Retrieved 2009-08-19.; Pedatzur, Reuven; Zraket, Charles; (1992-04-07). Archived from on 2003-01-15. Cite journal requires journal=. Retrieved 2009-10-09. ^ (2008).
Pp. 67–69, 75–77. Retrieved 2009-08-25. ^ Barzilai, Amnon. Retrieved 2009-09-18. ^. Defense update. Retrieved 2009-08-19.
^. Defense update.
Archived from on 2009-08-20. Retrieved 2009-08-19. ^ Sharp, Jeremy M.
Retrieved 2018-03-09. ^ Sharp, Jeremy M. Retrieved 2018-03-03. Clarke, Duncan L. (Summer 1994). 'The Arrow Missile: The United States, Israel and Strategic Cooperation'.
Middle East Journal. Middle East Institute. 48 (3): 478. Pedatzur, Reuven (October 1993).
The Arrow project and active defense – challenges and questions (paper).: Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies. Pike, John E; Bolkcom, Christopher (1993–96). Archived from on 2015-02-20. Retrieved 2015-02-20. Samson, Victoria (2002-10-09). Archived from on 6 September 2009.
Retrieved 2009-10-13. Israel Defense Prize for 2003 to developers and directors of the Arrow weapon system (in Hebrew). Retrieved 2010-03-20.
^ Pedatzur, Reuven. Archived from on 2013-01-25. Retrieved 2009-08-25. Pedatzur, Reuven (2009-02-18). Archived from on 2009-02-19. Retrieved 2009-08-25.
^, pp. 38, 40. ^ (2003-03-02). Retrieved 2009-09-10.
^. Archived from on 2007-11-13. Israel Missile Defense Organization.
Retrieved 2009-08-19. ^.
Archived from on 2009-09-05. Israel Missile Defense Organization. Archived from on 2009-09-05. Retrieved 2009-08-19. ^ (PDF). Archived from (PDF) on 2011-07-18.
Retrieved 2009-08-19. (PDF).
Center for Social and Political Studies. January 2004. Retrieved 2011-11-21.
^ Egozi, Arie (2004-08-03). Retrieved 2009-09-12. ^.
Archived from on 2008-05-31. Retrieved 2009-10-12. (PDF). Missile Defense Agency.
Archived from (PDF) on 2010-12-07. Retrieved 2009-11-04. Israel Missile Defense Organization. Archived from on 2009-09-06. Retrieved 2009-08-19. Genuth, Iddo (2004-08-10). Retrieved 2009-08-19.
^. Retrieved 2009-08-19. ^ Opall-Rome, Barbara (2005-03-14).
Archived from on 2013-02-02. Retrieved 2009-10-10.
^ (2008). Retrieved 2009-09-12.
^ (PDF). Missile Defense Agency. Archived from (PDF) on 2010-12-07. Retrieved 2009-11-04. Queen, John (2007-03-21).
Retrieved 2009-10-10. Harel, Amos (2007-03-26). Archived from on 2008-11-22. Retrieved 2009-08-19.
Katz, Yaakov (2007-03-26). Retrieved 2010-07-27. Katz, Yaakov (2007-03-30). Retrieved 2010-07-27. ^ Harel, Amos (2008-04-15). Archived from on 2008-04-19.
Retrieved 2009-08-26. ^.
Archived from on 2009-04-10. Retrieved 2009-08-19. Retrieved 2009-08-19. Katz, Yaakov (2009-04-07). Retrieved 2010-07-27.
Morgan, David (2009-07-14). Retrieved 2009-08-19. ^. Defense Update. Archived from on 2009-07-26.
Retrieved 2009-08-19. ^ Opall-Rome, Barbara (2009-07-29). Retrieved 2009-10-10. Archived from on 2011-07-18.
Retrieved 2009-08-25. ^. Missile Defense Agency. Archived from on 2010-02-23. Retrieved 2009-08-19.
^ Opall-Rome, Barbara (2010-03-22). Archived from on 2013-01-21. Retrieved 2010-03-22. ^ Opall-Rome, Barbara (2011-02-25). Retrieved 2011-04-18. Missile Defense Agency. Archived from on 2011-02-26.
Retrieved 2011-02-22. Eshel, Tamir (2012-02-10). Defense Update. Retrieved 2012-02-11.
Retrieved 2013-02-04. Opall-Rome, Barbara (2014-09-09). Archived from on 2014-09-13. Retrieved 2014-09-14. ^ Amouyal, Noa (2015-02-25). Retrieved 2015-02-27.
^ Opall-Rome, Barbara (2011-04-11). Retrieved 2011-05-01. Defense Update. Retrieved 2009-08-19. ^ Opall-Rome, Barbara (2017-08-02).
Retrieved 2017-08-03. ^ Samson, Victoria (2006-07-19). Retrieved 2009-10-13. ^ (PDF). Retrieved 2009-08-19. Barzilai, Amnon (2007-11-01).
Arrow Season 3 1080p Complete Download
Archived from on 2011-07-21. Retrieved 2009-08-23. ^ Schechter, Erik (2005-12-22). Retrieved 2011-02-25. ^ Raviv, Dov (2004-10-12). The nuclear threat on Israel – and the Arrow. Electronica (in Hebrew).
Archived from on November 24, 2004. Retrieved 2009-08-19. (2002).:. Retrieved 2009-09-12. ^. Retrieved 2012-08-04. ^.
Retrieved 2009-08-26. ^ Fulghum, David (2012-09-03).
Archived from on 2013-05-01. Retrieved 2012-09-03.
Archived from on 2011-07-12. Retrieved 2009-08-19.
^ Sung-ki, Jung (2009-09-17). Retrieved 2009-09-17. Azoulay, Yuval (2008-08-18). Archived from on 2008-08-21. Retrieved 2009-09-10.
^ (2012-01-26). Archived from on 2013-12-19. Retrieved 2012-01-27.
^. Archived from on 2014-01-10. Retrieved 2014-01-10. ^ (PDF). Retrieved 2009-08-19.
Archived from on 2003-03-05. Retrieved 2009-10-12. ^ (PDF). Missile Defense Agency. Archived from (PDF) on 2010-12-07. Retrieved 2009-11-04.
(PDF). Archived from (PDF) on 2011-09-12. Retrieved 2011-04-13. Israel Missile Defense Organization and United States Ballistic Missile Defense Organization.
(WMV). Katz, Yaakov (2007-08-23). Retrieved 2010-07-27. Archived from on 2010-03-28. Retrieved 2009-09-12. Dadon, Bar Josephine (2010-10-14). Archived from on 16 October 2010.
Retrieved 2010-10-14. Italic or bold markup not allowed in: publisher=. Bram, Shir Aharon (2012-02-13). Archived from on 2013-09-09. Retrieved 2012-03-13. Binnie, Jeremy (2013).
Retrieved 2013-06-01. ^ Pike, John E.
Global Security. From the original on 10 September 2009.
Retrieved 2009-08-26. Assamann, Lars (2007). Retrieved 2009-09-12. Dagoni, Ran (2011-03-24).
Retrieved 2011-03-24. Enginsoy, Umit; Bekdil, Burak Ege (2009-02-02).
Retrieved 2009-08-22., Dmilt, March 23, 2013, archived from on September 12, 2014. Opall-Rome, Barbara (2012-01-30). Archived from on 2017-10-11. Retrieved 2012-01-31. ^.
From the original on 7 October 2009. Retrieved 2009-09-18.
Associated Press. Retrieved 2009-09-18. Pfeffer, Anshel. Retrieved 2011-06-20. Armyrecognition.com, 15 October 2015. Opall-Rome, Barbara (2017-03-17).
Retrieved 2017-03-17. Opall-Rome, Barbara (2017-03-20). Retrieved 2017-03-20.Bibliography.; Nerguizian, Aram; Popescu, Ionut C. (2008). Bar-Joseph, Uri (2001). Frank Cass Publishers. Retrieved 2009-09-12.
Naveh, Ben-Zion; Lorber, Azriel (2001). Stav, Arieh (2004). Retrieved 2009-09-12.External links Wikimedia Commons has media related to. (official site), Israel: MoD, archived from on 2009-09-06, dedicated to the Arrow system.
(official site), Missile Defense Agency (MDA), archived from on 2015-09-26.
Next →The third season of the American television series premiered on on October 8, 2014, and concluded on May 13, 2015, with a total of 23 episodes. The series is based on the character, a costumed crime-fighter created by and, and is set in the, sharing continuity with other Arrowverse television series. The showrunners for this season were,. Stars as, with principal cast members as, as, as, as, as, as and as also returning from previous seasons.The series follows billionaire playboy , who claimed to have spent five years shipwrecked on, a mysterious island in the North China Sea, before returning home to (later renamed 'Star City') to fight crime and corruption as a secret vigilante whose weapon of choice is a bow and arrow.
In the third season, Oliver's company is sold to businessman, scientist and aspiring hero , who changes the company's name to Palmer Technologies and hires Felicity as Vice President. After Sara is found murdered, Oliver becomes embroiled in a conflict with.
He struggles to reconnect with his sister, Thea, who knows Malcolm is her father. Laurel sets out to follow Sara as the Black Canary.
Arrow 3 Interceptor System Upsc
Meanwhile, John becomes a father and struggles as a family man. The season features flashbacks to Oliver's third year since he was presumed dead, where after escaping Lian Yu, he is forced to work for leader in Hong Kong. Oliver and work to stop corrupt general from unleashing a pathogen, which Ra's al Ghul acquires in the present.The series was renewed for its third season on February 12, 2014, and began filming in, in that July. Despite a strong critical start for the season premiere, the season received more negative reviews than the previous seasons, and averaged 3.52 million viewers each week. The season would go on to be nominated for eleven nominations in various categories, winning two. This season includes the with spin-off TV series.
The season was released on DVD and Blu-ray on September 22, 2015. as. as.
as. as. as. as. as.
Matt Ward as. as. as. as. as. as.
as. Adrian Glynn McMorran as. as MeiProduction Development was renewed for a third season by on February 12, 2014. Writing Talking ahead of, executive producer stated that the theme of the season would be 'identity'. He and fellow EP confirmed that the series would continue six months on from the end of the previous season. Producers confirmed that the flashback sequences would continue this season, but be focused on Oliver's time in Hong Kong, and also examine the beginnings of his relationship with.Regarding character arcs, Guggenheim confirmed that both the characters of and would be developed further over the season saying 'Laurel and Thea are the two characters we haven't done as much with in the past, and they have the strongest storylines that we've ever given them.'
In particular, Thea's relationship with her father would be further explored, including a flashback to their encounter in the season two finale. Regarding Laurel, Kreisberg stated that 'We're going to see Laurel take a few big steps toward her comic book self this season.' Following previous revelations that the first episode would feature a date between and, Kreisberg stated that 'The way the show has shaken out and the experiences the two have had, it feels like it's time to explore that.' He also confirmed that would be 'invading Oliver's life in every aspect', as well as injecting more humor into the season.It was also disclosed at San Diego that the season would feature an episode exploring the origins of the character Felicity Smoak, to be entitled 'Oracle', which would focus on her time at.
It was confirmed by Marc Guggengheim in August that the episode name had been changed to ' and that the episode would also introduce Felicity's mother,.Kreisberg also confirmed that would make an appearance as in the second episode of the season, during a flashback sequence.The preview of the third season trailer revealed the season 'big bad' to be. Talking about potential story arcs, Kreisberg noted the possibility of Oliver working with Malcolm Merlyn against Ra's – 'We've established firmly that Ra's al Ghul hates Merlyn and Oliver doesn't like Merlyn. It's going to be series of who hates who more.' Casting In July 2014, the series cast several season regulars, including as along with was, as and as was also cast as, in a guest role. The following month, it was announced that would be joining the series as Felicity's mother,.
Later the same month, was cast as Felicity's former boyfriend. In September, was cast in the role of the season's antagonist,.
Was cast in a guest role as in the same month. Was confirmed to return as for at least three episodes at the start of the season. Filming The season began filming in, in July 2014.
Arrowverse tie-ins The third season includes the first annual crossover with spin-off series: '. Release Broadcast The season began airing in the United States on on October 8, 2014, and completed its 23-episode run on May 13, 2015.Home media Arrow: Season 3 was released as a 5-disc DVD set and as a 9-disc Blu-ray and DVD combo pack set on September 22, 2015 in the United States and September 28, 2015 in the United Kingdom. The DVD and Blu-ray box sets contain additional features, including making-of featurettes, deleted scenes, gag reel, and highlights from the Paley Fest.
Reception Critical response Despite a strong critical start for the third season premiere, the season received more negative reviews than the previous seasons.Writing for, Chancellor Agard noted that season had been an uneven one where the 'highs have been rather high and the lows have been almost insufferable' and highlighted that the season' biggest problem seemed to lie in the characterisation and motivation of the season's big bad,. He did however praise the development of the character as well as the development of Oliver's relationship with.Katie Kulzick, of noted that the season had a habit of 'making bold moves and all too frequently backing away from, rather than embracing, the ramifications of these series-altering decisions.'
Despite the season's 'significant problems', she felt groundwork had been laid for interesting potential storylines, in particular the development of becoming a member of the team as Speedy, for with Palmer Technologies and for Oliver to develop a fresh perspective.The season finale was described as 'dull', 'lacking scope', and 'underwhelming' by IGN's Jesse Schedeen in light of the 'high standard' the show had previously established for its finales. He cemented the mixed reception of the third season as being 'haphazardly paced' and 'struggling to develop a clear sense of direction'. Ratings The third season averaged 3.52 million viewers across the 23 episodes, ranking 135th among television show viewership.
^ Bibel, Sara (October 16, 2014). Archived from on November 14, 2014. Retrieved October 16, 2014. ^ Bibel, Sara (October 16, 2014). Archived from on October 18, 2014. Retrieved October 16, 2014.
^ Kondolojy, Amanda (October 23, 2014). Archived from on October 25, 2014. Retrieved October 23, 2014. ^ Bibel, Sara (October 30, 2014). Archived from on November 1, 2014.
Retrieved October 30, 2014. ^ Kondolojy, Amanda (November 6, 2014). From the original on November 8, 2014. Retrieved November 6, 2014. ^ Bibel, Sara (November 13, 2014). From the original on November 15, 2014.
Retrieved November 13, 2014. ^ Kondolojy, Amanda (November 20, 2014). From the original on November 22, 2014. Retrieved November 20, 2014.
^ Kondolojy, Amanda (December 4, 2014). From the original on March 16, 2017. Retrieved December 4, 2014. ^ Bibel, Sara (December 11, 2014). From the original on December 19, 2014. Retrieved December 11, 2014.
^ Bibel, Sara (January 22, 2015). From the original on January 23, 2015. Retrieved January 22, 2015. ^ Kondolojy, Amanda (January 29, 2015). From the original on January 30, 2015. Retrieved January 29, 2015. ^ Bibel, Sara (February 5, 2015).
From the original on February 6, 2015. Retrieved February 5, 2015. ^ Kondolojy, Amanda (February 12, 2015). From the original on February 12, 2015. Retrieved February 12, 2015. ^ Bibel, Sara (February 19, 2015). From the original on February 21, 2015.
Retrieved February 19, 2015. ^ Kondolojy, Amanda (February 26, 2015). Archived from on February 27, 2015.
Retrieved February 26, 2015. ^ Bibel, Sara (March 19, 2015). From the original on April 2, 2015. Retrieved March 19, 2015.
^ Kondolojy, Amanda (March 26, 2015). From the original on November 22, 2015. Retrieved March 26, 2015. ^ Bibel, Sara (April 2, 2015). From the original on April 4, 2015.
Retrieved April 2, 2015. ^ Bibel, Sara (April 16, 2015).
From the original on April 17, 2015. Retrieved April 16, 2015. ^ Kondolojy, Amanda (April 23, 2015). From the original on November 22, 2015.
Retrieved April 23, 2015. ^ Bibel, Sara (April 30, 2015). Archived from on May 1, 2015. Retrieved April 30, 2015.
^ Kondolojy, Amanda (May 7, 2015). From the original on May 8, 2015. Retrieved May 7, 2015.
^ Bibel, Sara (May 14, 2015). From the original on May 16, 2015. Retrieved May 14, 2015. ^ Abrams, Natalie (July 18, 2014). From the original on July 7, 2017. Retrieved July 9, 2018. The Deadline Team (July 3, 2014).
From the original on July 29, 2017. Retrieved September 13, 2017. Ahr, Michael (October 7, 2014). From the original on October 13, 2017. Retrieved July 9, 2018. ^ Mitovich, Matt Webb (July 29, 2014).
From the original on June 23, 2017. Retrieved September 13, 2017. ^ Holman, Jordyn (July 7, 2014).
From the original on July 9, 2018. Retrieved September 13, 2017. Mitovich, Matt Webb (August 1, 2014). From the original on March 3, 2016. Retrieved September 13, 2017. Andreeva, Nellie (August 27, 2014). From the original on September 16, 2017.
Retrieved September 13, 2017. ^ Mitovich, Matt Webb (August 29, 2014). From the original on June 14, 2016. Retrieved September 11, 2017.
^ Ng, Philiana (September 4, 2014). From the original on June 1, 2016. Retrieved September 13, 2017. Ng, Philiana (September 5, 2014). From the original on June 20, 2018. Retrieved July 9, 2018.
^ Prudom, Laura (October 20, 2014). From the original on October 21, 2014.
Retrieved September 13, 2017. Abrams, Natalie (July 3, 2014). From the original on November 6, 2017. Retrieved July 9, 2018. Ng, Philiana (August 28, 2014). From the original on July 30, 2017. Retrieved September 11, 2017.
February 12, 2014. From the original on October 19, 2014. Retrieved October 14, 2014. ^ Ng, Philiana (July 23, 2014). From the original on May 29, 2018. Retrieved July 9, 2018.
^ Pester, Lauren (July 25, 2014). From the original on July 2, 2018.
Retrieved July 6, 2018. Abrams, Natalie (August 18, 2014). From the original on July 10, 2018. Retrieved July 9, 2018. Ng, Philiana (July 26, 2014). From the original on September 24, 2016. Retrieved July 9, 2018.
Abrams, Natalie (August 1, 2014). From the original on July 8, 2017. Retrieved July 5, 2018. Ng, Philiana (August 28, 2014). From the original on July 30, 2017. Retrieved July 5, 2018. Gitting, Susan (July 13, 2014).
'YVR Shoots'. From the original on July 10, 2018. Retrieved July 9, 2018. Abram, Natalie (July 18, 2014). From the original on July 20, 2014.
Retrieved June 5, 2017. Chitwood, Adam (July 18, 2014). From the original on March 16, 2017. Retrieved November 12, 2016.
From the original on June 14, 2015. Retrieved June 12, 2015. Retrieved March 31, 2015.
Arrow 3 Complete Series
October 8, 2014. From the original on June 10, 2015. Agard, Chancellor (May 14, 2015). From the original on August 3, 2017. Retrieved July 9, 2018. Kulzick, Kate (May 14, 2018). From the original on August 27, 2017.
Retrieved July 9, 2018. Schedeen, Jesse (May 20, 2015). From the original on December 2, 2017. de Moraes, Lisa (May 21, 2015). Deadline Hollywood. From the original on May 22, 2015.
Retrieved April 1, 2016. Bibel, Sara (October 27, 2014).
TV by the Numbers. From the original on October 29, 2014.
Retrieved November 14, 2014. TV by the Numbers. November 3, 2014.
From the original on March 9, 2016. Retrieved September 24, 2016. Bibel, Sara (December 8, 2014).
TV by the Numbers. From the original on December 18, 2014. Retrieved December 21, 2014.
Kondolojy, Amanda (December 8, 2014). TV by the Numbers.
From the original on December 18, 2014. Retrieved December 8, 2014. Kondolojy, Amanda (February 9, 2015). TV by the Numbers. From the original on February 9, 2015. Retrieved February 9, 2015. Kondolojy, Amanda (February 17, 2015).
TV by the Numbers. From the original on March 5, 2016. Retrieved February 17, 2015.
TV by the Numbers. April 6, 2015. From the original on November 21, 2015. Retrieved April 6, 2015. Bibel, Sara (April 13, 2015).
TV by the Numbers. From the original on May 5, 2015. Retrieved May 12, 2015. Kondolojy, Amanda (April 20, 2015). TV by the Numbers.
From the original on May 25, 2015. Retrieved May 12, 2015. Kondolojy, Amanda (May 12, 2015). TV by the Numbers. From the original on May 4, 2015. Retrieved May 4, 2015. Bibel, Sara (May 26, 2015).
TV by the Numbers. From the original on May 26, 2015. Retrieved June 1, 2015. Kondolojy, Amanda (June 1, 2015). TV by the Numbers.
From the original on June 2, 2015. Retrieved June 1, 2015. From the original on October 17, 2015.
Retrieved April 22, 2015. From the original on March 4, 2016.
Retrieved June 14, 2015. Teen Choice Awards. Archived from on August 18, 2015.
Retrieved December 9, 2015. Retrieved July 16, 2015. Bell, Crystal (July 13, 2015). From the original on June 17, 2016.External links Wikiquote has quotations related to:.
List of on. List of at.